Model launches
Introducing HIPAA-compliant DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: the flash model that outruns its Pro sibling
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 - the general-availability checkpoint of our 284B MoE efficiency model (13B active) - now outperforms DeepSeek-V4-Pro (Preview) across agentic and coding benchmarks, starting at $0.14/M input on our HIPAA-compliant design-partner program, under a BAA with zero data retention.
TL;DR
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 turns our budget workhorse into an agentic powerhouse: it beats DeepSeek-V4-Pro (Preview) on nearly every agentic and coding benchmark - at roughly a tenth of closed-frontier pricing, now HIPAA-compliant under a BAA.
In early July, we launched DeepSeek-V4-Flash: the efficiency model that made frontier-adjacent speed genuinely cheap. Today, we are announcing the checkpoint that rewrites that story. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, the general-availability release from the DeepSeek-V4 family, is now available on our secure, HIPAA-compliant API platform under our design-partner program.
This is not a minor patch. On the agentic and coding benchmarks that matter most for real workloads, the 0731 checkpoint doesn't just improve on the preview - it outranks its own Pro sibling despite activating a fraction of the parameters, and lands within striking distance of Claude Opus 4.8. See the full specs and capabilities →
What is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 keeps the hyper-lean architecture we introduced in July: a 284-billion-parameter sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model that activates only 13 billion parameters per token, packed with a full 1-million-token context window. The checkpoint is released under the MIT license, and it ships with a DSpark speculative decoding module attached - target and draft weights in a single checkpoint - so you get faster generation without a separate draft model.
Under the hood it's still the V4 hybrid-attention design - Compressed Sparse
Attention (CSA) combined with Heavily Compressed Attention (HCA) - which
cuts KV-cache memory to roughly 10% of standard requirements. And DeepSeek
expanded the thinking controls: reasoning_effort now supports three levels
(low, high, and max) to trade latency against deliberation depth.
Performance profile: what it's good at vs. what it's not
The preview's promise was speed and price. The 0731's promise is agentic capability at that same price. Here's where it shines - and where it falls short.
What DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 excels at
- Long-horizon agentic autonomy. The gains here are the story of the release. On DeepSWE, the model jumps from 7.3 (preview) to 54.4 - a 7x improvement in one checkpoint. Cybergym goes 38.7 → 76.7, and AutomationBench 10.8 → 25.1. This is the first flash-class model that serious agent frameworks are treating as a flagship.
- Terminal and CLI work. At 82.7 on Terminal Bench 2.1, it sits above GLM-5.2 (81.0) and within reach of Claude Opus 4.8 (85.0) - while costing a fraction of either.
- Tool use and multi-step execution. Toolathlon-Verified jumps to 70.3 (from 49.7 preview and 55.9 for V4-Pro Preview). Community testers report more thorough tool usage, deeper delegation of subagents, and better step-count persistence than the preview.
- Repository-scale coding. NL2Repo climbs to 54.2, beating the Pro Preview (38.5) and approaching GLM-5.2 (48.9) territory on a fraction of the active compute.
- A budget price that stayed budget. At $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output tokens - the same price point as the original Flash - the 0731 delivers a step-change in capability without a step-change in cost. Independent analyses put it on par with GPT-5.6 Luna at a fraction of the price - even after OpenAI's 80% price cut.
Limitations to keep in mind
- Rule-following reports are mixed. The preview's biggest weakness was inconsistent adherence to system rules and "skills" prompts. Some users running the 0731 locally at full precision report the issue persists, while others - particularly via API serving - describe a major improvement. It's sensitive to serving configuration and prompt structure, so benchmark your own workflows.
- Text-only processing. Like the rest of the V4-Flash line, it doesn't natively parse images, charts, or unextracted medical scans.
- The hardest frontier coding is still out of reach. On the toughest end of the spectrum (Opus-level DeepSWE-Hard and full-stack tasks), it trails the most expensive proprietary models - close, but not across the line.
- Factual deep-recall gaps. Its lean active-parameter count means it lacks the "encyclopedic" recall of trillion-parameter flagships on specialized deep-factual retrieval.
- Long outputs for deep thinking. At
high/maxreasoning effort, DeepSeek recommends planning for outputs up to 384K tokens - budget token volume accordingly for agentic workloads.
The benchmarks: how DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 compares
The headline from DeepSeek's own model card: "DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 outperforms DeepSeek-V4-Pro (Preview) on benchmarks listed below despite its far smaller activated parameter count, and is broadly competitive with the strongest proprietary models available."
| Benchmark | Focus area | Flash-0731 | Flash (Preview) | V4-Pro (Preview) | Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal Bench 2.1 | Terminal / CLI agents | 82.7 | 61.8 | 72.1 | 85.0 |
| NL2Repo | Repo-scale coding | 54.2 | 39.4 | 38.5 | 69.7 |
| Cybergym | Cyber / security agents | 76.7 | 38.7 | 52.7 | 83.1 |
| DeepSWE | Hard software engineering | 54.4 | 7.3 | 12.8 | 58.0 |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Tool use | 70.3 | 49.7 | 55.9 | 76.2 |
| Agents' Last Exam | General agentic reasoning | 25.2 | 15.8 | 16.5 | 25.7 |
| AutomationBench Public | Automation agents | 25.1 | 10.8 | 12.8 | 27.2 |
| DSBench-FullStack | Full-stack development | 68.7 | 37.0 | 41.8 | 71.6 |
| DSBench-Hard | Difficult coding agents | 59.6 | 25.8 | 31.1 | 71.7 |
The developer community noticed: major coding-agent platforms called it "the first flash model we've found that performs at SOTA levels" and moved to make it free in their products - while r/LocalLLaMA's early testing echoes the agentic gains, alongside the rule-following caveats above.
Why run DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 via our HIPAA-compliant API?
A 284B MoE with speculative decoding is a serious serving project - and running it internally while maintaining rigid healthcare compliance is an even bigger one. Through our API you get the best of both worlds:
- Enterprise-grade privacy. Available under our HIPAA-compliant design-partner program with a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA), end-to-end encryption, and a strict zero-data-retention policy on your prompts and outputs. Your patient data is never used for training. General availability is coming soon.
- Uncompromised performance. We handle the hardware complexity, serving optimization (including DSpark speculative decoding), and context-window scaling - so you get agentic-grade behavior without standing up your own cluster.
- Transparent pricing. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 runs at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output, with cached-input pricing at $0.028/M - a fraction of closed-frontier pricing on Azure OpenAI and AWS Bedrock, for a model that now performs at or above its own Pro sibling.
Ready to put agentic-grade coding and automation under your BAA - for utilization review pipelines, clinical documentation agents, or the next generation of health-tech tooling? Join the waitlist now.
Run it HIPAA-compliant
DeepSeek-V4-Flash on OpenMed Router
$0.14/M input · $0.28/M output · 1048576 context
Chris Williams, MD
Chris Williams, MD is a physician, clinical AI researcher and the co-founder of OpenMed Router, working to make open source AI models safely accessible to healthcare organizations under HIPAA. He writes about clinical AI, model selection, compliance, and the practical adoption of open source inference in clinical and operational workflows.
Join the waitlist